El Fondo · Stock comparison
Not sure what a stock is? Start here
Putting two companies side by side is the fastest way to see where they actually differ: what they cost, what they earn, and how much debt they carry doing it.
Type the name or the ticker: AAPL, MELI, KO, GMEXICOB. The search accepts either and shows you the whole company before you add it.
The tool lays them out in columns with the same metrics in the same order, so the difference stands out instead of having to be hunted for.
Valuation, profitability, growth, dividend and debt, one under the other. There is no single right answer. What changes is which difference matters to you.
Seven differences explain almost everything that separates two companies that look comparable on paper.
What you pay for each unit of earnings or book value. They only say something within the same sector: a P/E of 12 is expensive for a miner and cheap for a software company.
The margin says how much of each sale survives; return on capital says how much the money already invested produces. Two companies with the same revenue can be in quite different businesses.
Compare several years, not the latest one. An exceptional quarter can come from an asset sale or a soft comparison base rather than from the business.
A high yield can mean the share price fell, not that the company pays more. Look at the payout ratio: how much of earnings leaves as dividends and how much stays to reinvest.
The same earnings support very different debt depending on sector and cycle. A leveraged company returns more when things go well and suffers sooner when they stop.
In thinly traded companies the bid-ask spread widens, and that spread costs you on every trade, particularly on the region's local exchanges.
A US-listed share trades in dollars. If your expenses are in pesos, soles or reais, the exchange rate affects your return as much as the company's own performance.
The commonest mistake in comparing is crossing sectors. A bank, a miner and a software company have cost structures, cycles and capital needs so different that their multiples do not mean the same thing. A low P/E at a miner usually reflects a metal price that is high and not expected to stay there; the same number in software would be a very different signal.
The same applies to comparing a growing company with a mature one. The grower reinvests its earnings and often trades at high multiples while paying no dividend; the mature one pays out and grows little. Neither is better for it. They are different bets, and comparing them on a single metric hides exactly what separates them.
This comparison is information, not financial advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.