Compare stocks
Not sure what a stock is? Start here
Putting two companies side by side is the fastest way to see where they actually differ: what they cost, what they earn, and how much debt they carry doing it.
Type the name or the ticker: AAPL, MELI, KO, GMEXICOB. The search accepts either and shows the company's profile before you add it.
The tool lays them out in columns with the same metrics in the same order, so the differences are evident without having to search for them.
Valuation, profitability, growth, dividend and debt, one under the other. There is no single right answer. What changes is which difference matters to you.
Seven differences explain almost everything that separates two companies that look comparable on paper.
What the market pays for each unit of earnings or book value. These multiples are only comparable within the same sector: a P/E of 12 is high for a miner and low for a software company.
The margin shows how much of each sale becomes profit; return on capital shows how much the capital already invested produces. Two companies with the same revenue can be in quite different businesses.
Compare several years, not the latest one. An exceptional quarter can come from an asset sale or a soft comparison base rather than from the business.
A high yield can mean the share price fell, not that the company pays more. Look at the payout ratio: how much of earnings leaves as dividends and how much stays to reinvest.
The same earnings support very different debt levels depending on sector and cycle. A leveraged company earns a higher return in favorable periods and is affected sooner when the cycle turns.
In thinly traded companies the bid-ask spread widens, and that spread costs you on every trade, particularly on the region's local exchanges.
A US-listed share trades in dollars. If your expenses are in pesos, soles or reais, the exchange rate affects your return as much as the company's own performance.
The commonest mistake in comparing is crossing sectors. A bank, a miner and a software company have cost structures, cycles and capital needs so different that their multiples do not mean the same thing. A low P/E at a miner usually reflects a metal price that is high and not expected to stay there; the same number in software would be a very different signal.
The same applies to comparing a growing company with a mature one. The grower reinvests its earnings and often trades at high multiples while paying no dividend; the mature one pays out and grows little. Neither is better for it. They are different profiles, and comparing them on a single metric hides exactly what separates them.
This comparison is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results.